Great Lakes Water Levels Expected to Stay Above Long-Term Average

By Kevin Bunch, IJC

chicago coastline lake michigan
Extremely high water levels can cause erosion and increase flood risks in coastal areas, such as along the Chicago coastline off Lake Michigan. Levels are not expected to be high enough to significantly increase those risks in the coming months, however. Credit: L.S. Gerstner

Water levels on the Great Lakes are likely to remain above the long-term average through the spring and summer, according to forecasts assembled by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada and the US Army Corps of Engineers. But none of the Great Lakes are expected to reach record high water levels set mostly in the 1980s or 1950s.

While each lake is unique, they all tend to follow a similar cycle based on seasonal changes. Water levels typically reach their seasonal low during the winter months before increasing in the spring due to snowmelt and precipitation. Water levels tend to peak during the summer months, before beginning to drop in the fall and early winter.

There are three main factors that impact lake water levels, said Drew Gronewold, physical scientist with NOAA’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory: the precipitation over the lakes, evaporation of water on the lakes into vapor, and the runoff that comes into the lakes.

These variables, in turn, are affected by changes in air and water temperatures. For example, Gronewold said the timing of big runoff pulses is dependent on the amount of snow building up in the winter months and when it melts in the spring.

A water level decline in the fall is generally driven by evaporation, as air temperatures drop while surface water temperatures are still relatively warm. While water temperatures were relatively warm during the fall and winter months of 2016-2017 – leading to a lack of ice cover – evaporation amounts have been typical for this time of year due to a relatively mild winter air temperatures, Gronewold said.

These recent conditions, coupled with historical data, lead agencies to expect the water level rise to remain fairly typical this spring and into the summer. As water levels are already above their long-term average for this time of year, researchers expect that they’ll remain above average in the coming months, Gronewold explained.

There is still plenty of uncertainty, he added, as the amount of snow on the ground is less than it has been in some recent winters. It’s also difficult to predict continental-wide meteorological and climate patterns that impact Great Lakes weather patterns and temperatures. These can range from an El Niño effect like the one seen in the winter of 2015-2016 or a “polar vortex” that hit the region in the winters of 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. This uncertainty is expressed as a range of possible water levels in the forecasts released by the US Army Corps and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

Great Lakes water levels also can be influenced by human management. Hydropower plants and a gated dam on the St. Marys River are used to manage outflows from Lake Superior into Lake Michigan-Huron, while a hydropower plant on the St. Lawrence River is used to manage outflows from Lake Ontario. Outflows through these structures are managed binationally by boards and according to orders and criteria established by the IJC. Nonetheless, the control of water flows through these lakes is limited, and weather conditions and water supplies remain the most significant factor affecting water levels.

Water levels are measured based on the International Great Lakes Datum, defined as the height above sea level at Rimouski Quebec on the St. Lawrence River. Agencies have been measuring lake levels since the 1860s, with more reliable levels going back as far as 1918. They base the lakes’ long-term average water levels on that information.

“We expect a range of water level conditions depending on water supplies,” said Jacob Bruxer, senior water resources engineer with Environment and Climate Change Canada. “There’s a lot of variability and uncertainty in weather and water supply forecasts, particularly when looking beyond a few weeks’ time, so we don’t try to forecast any specific trends and instead consider a full range of water supply scenarios that could be expected.”

According to recent forecasts, through September 2017 Lake Superior is likely to remain at or above seasonal averages, with a small chance of falling below its long-term average in July. There is less uncertainty for the spring months; water levels were about 5.5 inches (0.14 meters) above the long-term average by the end of March, and by May that range could be between 2.7 inches to 10 inches above the average (0.07 meters to 0.27 meters). By September, water levels could be as high as 1 foot (0.3 meters) above the long-term monthly average for Superior.

low water levels grand traverse bay
Low water levels can limit boat access to the water – as seen with these docks off Grand Traverse Bay in Michigan – and cause shipping problems in the Great Lakes. Credit: Michigan Sea Grant

Lake Michigan-Huron, considered as one lake hydrologically, was about 9.4 inches (0.24 meters) above the March long-term average by the end of the month. By September, Michigan-Huron is expected to remain above the long-term average, in a range of 1-16 inches (0.02-0.4 meters). Gronewold said Michigan-Huron saw water levels fall slightly more during the fall months of 2016 than is typical, but that is unlikely to make a discernible difference during this spring and summer.

Higher-than-average water levels are anticipated on Lake Erie, which has seen water levels on the rise in recent months, reaching more than 17 inches (0.44 meters) above the long-term average by the end of March. Water levels are expected to continue to remain above average this spring, before starting to fall around June to a range of 3.9-16 inches above average (0.10-0.41 meters).

Lake Ontario has a slight chance of being just barely below its long-term average going into summer, but will more likely be above it by up to 15 inches (0.38 meters). The forecasted peak is in May, when water levels could be 3.9-21 inches above average (0.10-0.55 meters). Water levels are then expected to fall at about the same degree as they usually do, according to the long-term average.

The US Army Corps publishes 12-month forecasts for Lakes Erie, Huron-Michigan and Superior, as well as Lake St. Clair, based on current conditions and similar historical weather data. Uncertainty grows substantially more than six months out, but most outcomes for Lakes Erie and Michigan-Huron suggest a greater likelihood of continued higher-than-average water levels through the year. Lake Superior also has a better chance of higher-than-average water levels, but faces a substantial possibility of being below that long-term average, too.

Kevin Bunch is a writer-communications specialist at the IJC’s US Section office in Washington, D.C.

7 thoughts on “Great Lakes Water Levels Expected to Stay Above Long-Term Average”

  1. Who will be paying for the damage caused by keeping the water levels higher than the weather would have created. I for one have never seen the lake this high in 35 years and have not lost much property till now. My guess 10 feet so far. I live at the of Rt 63 in New York state. The level must be lowered now or the damage will not be fixable. Your data only shows lake height and not wave and wind effects or their power at the shoreline. Stone and breaks walls don’t do a thing now.

    1. All you have to do is look at the very well documented lake levels in 1993, 1973, 1974, 1953 and 1952. All of those years, Lake Ontario was at or above where it is now. Given the fact that the St Lawrence River is 3 feet above average at Montreal and people have been evacuated there; to increase outflows from Ontario would be irresponsible. We are at the mercy of this lake, not the other way around.

  2. Someone at the Joint Commission will need to give a better explanation then what I am reading above. “lake levels will be above average but they could also be at normal.” What kind of a prediction is that? They also admit that snow levels were low this past winter in the upper lakes region so the melt should not have had a big impact. Precipitation levels were low over the winter months and with little ice cover the evaporation rate should have been higher than normal. Lake levels do not go up or down overnight. It takes weeks and surely all of these factors were well known to the Commission.
    They also need to explain what impact (if any) the joint agreement signed last December on lake level control may have had on the conditions were are facing today. I heard some disturbing media reports that stated the primary intention of the agreement was to smooth out the normal level fluctuation in order to preserve wet land for wildlife (I believe the muskrat was specifically mentioned). If this in fact was the stated intent then there is an implication that the Commission has more control over lake levels than they are telling us.
    Someone besides the Commission needs to do a more in depth investigation of all the factors that led into the conditions we face today.

  3. Like the previous comments I am concerned about lake levels (we back onto Lake Ontario). Our area was developed 14 years ago and in speaking with neighbours who have been here since then no one has ever seen the water this high. While there are break walls etc there is no question that damage is being done.

    Research indicates that there is not one but two governments involved (and what couple possibly go wrong with that?) in deciding which dams should (and should not) be opened to affect levels). My question is simple…who decides which properties get damaged ?

  4. New York wants President Trump to write yet another Presidential Order to get out of 2014 then he’ll come to the lake and wave his hand over the water to order it to drop. Then we’ll all be saved.

  5. If you are going to manipulate our water levels, you need to allow for mother nature. These problems didn’t just pop up. Do you have a meteorologist on staff?Or better yet, don’t mess with the lake in the 1st place,if you don’t know what you are doing.I’m sure the muskets appreciate your help,but we need lower levels now!Thank you for listening

  6. My retirement home and property on Bay of Quinte/Lake Ontario has been severely damaged by flooding and according to what I am reading on Lake Ontario levels they are currently above the 100 yr flood mark and any in recorded history. We need some fact checking…what is the total rainfall accumulation over the great lakes basin this year compared to previous years..how has Plan 2014 ( the new plan that dictates outflows at Moses-Saunders Dam vs the previous plan that was in place since 1958) changed the way water levels are managed? Is their any coalition or association for property owners on Lake Ontario to have their concerns addressed? I invite any assistance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *